On a weekend boating excursion, husband and wife, Rob and Pia become lost and end up in the most unlikely place, a thick brush filled marsh, on an island in the middle of nowhere. With their boat in disarray, darkness coming on, and a heavy thunderstorm starting up, their only solution is to look for help or seek shelter of some kind. They finally come across a decrepit house and barn with no one home. However, there are definite signs of the house being inhabited, and the enormous crop of marijuana in the barn suggests the homeowners may not welcome their presence. Even worse, there is no telephone or means of communication to the outside world. But when the deranged, redneck owners, Brett, Jimmy and their even more sadistic father Poppy return, Rob and Pia realize a fear far beyond anything they have ever known. Furious with the unwanted intrusion of the affluent, snooping intruders, the monstrously sadistic farmers imprison and torture the couple, who fearing for their lives, ... Written by kikdvd

It is a shame that this film never got a shot in U.S. theatres. It certainly deserved a chance: it definitely would have pleased audiences, and it might have surprised a few critics, proving that the much despised “anti-tourism” sub-genre of horror (HOSTEL, TURISTAS, WOLF CREEK) can still yield a worthy title or two. STORM WARNING is an intense, violent thriller featuring some of the most inventive graphic blood-letting ever captured on celluloid. That may not sound like much of an enticement – after all, excessive on-screen violence is de rigeuer these days – but STORM WARNING manages to orchestrate the mayhem in a way that is gruesome, funny, and completely satisfying to anyone who cares about story and characterization. In short, you do not have to be a gore-lover to love this movie.

Written by Everett De Roche (ROAD GAMES), the screenplay mixes elements of DELIVERANCE and STRAW DOGS – not to mention “Goldilocks and the Three Bears”! A married couple, out boating off the coast of Australia, get caught in a storm and end up lost on an isolated island, where they seek shelter in an empty, rundown house, which turns to have three rather unfriendly inhabitants. The couple is captured, degraded, and tormented; the husband Rob’s leg is broken, and the wife Pia is targeted for rape, until a disagreement over who goes first leads to a break in the action. While the “Three Bears” – a father and two sons – decide what to do, the wife uses the opportunity to turn the tables on the captors, setting a horrific booby-trap and using her artistic skills to fashion a unique I.U.D. that -in a scene that must be seen to be believed - provides a most painfully unwelcome surprise for a would-be rapist.

The clever thing about STORM WARNING is the way it plays with genre expectations, delivering the goods while subverting the usual structure.   The film strikes a perfect balance between set-up and payback: instead of eighty minutes of atrocities perpetrated on our lead characters in exchange for a brief final-reel comeuppance for the villains, STORM WARNING spends its first two acts establishing the repulsive qualities of its villains and then lets the heroes turn the tables for the third act, which works perfectly.

Much of the fun comes from seeing the usual horror cliches perpetrated on the bad guys. (As Dirty Harry said in MAGNUM FORCE, “There’s nothing wrong with shooting, as long as the right people get shot.”) For example,  when older brother Jimmy (David Lyons), thinking he has found the married couple’s hiding place, shoots a couple holes in a closet, it is the bloody dead body of his brother Brett (Matthew Wilkinson) that comes falling out in time honored tradition. In another over-the-top moment, the set-up regarding a vicious attack dog (who likes the scent of fresh blood) pays off when Poppy (John Brumpton) pursues Pia (Nadia Fares) after having been mangled by her penis-flytrap invention – only to himself become the victim of his own dog. And as a nod to Batman, the good overcoming evil theme plays out throughout the film. In fact, notice the presence of Batman shirts on Poppy in the cellar scene as if carefully designed just for Batman fans as poetic justice takes out the evil-doers.

Jamie Blanks (whose debut with URBAN LEGENDS was nothing more than another anonymous post-SCREAM clone) does an impressive job here, directing, scoring, and co-editing the film. He builds tension, captures the horrible sense of impotence and helplessness at Rob and Pia’s dilemma, and serves up the payoff in a way guarnateed to satisfy. He does not flinch from showing gruesome violence, but the retribution is so perfectly calibrated to suit the crimes, that even viewers who normally shy away from this kind of thing may find themselves shrieking in appreciative glee.

Fares and Taylor are strong in the leads. Fares ably charts Pia’s transition from squeamish wife (she flinches over the death of a fish) to ruthless avenger (”You have to think like a mad dog…only madder”). Taylor gets points for portraying the unexpected: with his big, strong frame, he seems set up to be the hero but instead winds up figuratively emasculated, mostly cheering his wife on from the sidelines.

Lyons and Wilkinson do good work as the creepy brothers, especially Lyons, who shows not only a few hints of wit and intelligence but also a righteous sense of class resentment agains the rich city folk who have made themselves at home in his family’s lair. Wilkinson is not always as on-target – at times he comes across as a one-dimensional, grinning buffoon – but in the end, even he gives a few shades of gray. Both actors suggest that their characters could have turned out differently under better circumstances – which is part of the film’s strategy of turning them from villains into victims, offering just a smidgen of sympathy before delivering the killing blow. No such sympathy is extended for Poppy, who makes his sons look like choir boys by comparison. Brumpton does a fantastic job with portraying wild-eyed sleaze; he’s thoroughly disgusting without every going over-the-top into camp.

STROM WARNING may feel a bit too familiar to be considered a truly great film. Certainly, the parallels with WOLF CREEK are inescapable (although WARNING’s script was actually written decades earlier, it could not get financing until CREEK proved the viability of the concept). In truth, although WARNING has a much more compressed opening, CREEK’s first act is far more involving (it’s a horror film that is interesting long before the horror rears its ugly head), and it hits a level of convincing brutality that WARNING never quite matches. On the other hand, in the final act, WARNING delivers the goods in a way that CREEK never did.

STORM WARNING does more than simply repulse its audience; it offers a good, old-fashioned catharsis. So many horror films stumble over their endings these days. They tend to be contrived, as if trying to out-guess the audience: on the one hand, slapping on surprise twists as if afraid that a happy ending will be too sentimental for the horror crowd; on the other hand, adding hokey happy endings as if afraid that a mainstream audience will not accept anything else. STORM WARNING avoids the post-modern dilemma by simply following its story through to the best possible conclusion. It’s a simply, neat, and very effective old trick that more films should use.

 DVD DETAILS

The Unrated DVD of STORM WARNING features the complete, uncut version of the film (which had been trimmed slighlty for theatrical release in its native country). The disc delivers good picture and sound quality, with a minimum of features: English subtitles for the hearing impaired, a Teaser Trailer, a Theatrical Trailer, and an audio commentary.

The audio commentary features Jamie Blanks, Everet De Roche, Robert Taylor, and several other crew members. As might be expected from the number of people involved, there is a party atmosphere at work, with lots of joking and laughter; fortunately, there is little interrupting or cross-talk, and much interesting information emerges:

• Jamie Blanks defends STORM WARNING against accusations of ripping off WOLF CREEK, by pointing out that the script was written nearly thirty years previously, but he admits that the success of WOLF CREEK probably helped STORM WARNING finally get financed.
• Everet De Roche (who claims his script was inspired by the fairy tale of “Goldilocks and the Three Bears”) explains why the script was never made previously: “My agent said it was too graphic…”
• The film was shot on a 24-day schedule, with only a few days on actual location. The farm where most of the action takes place was shot on an interior set, with computer imagery filling in the sky and backgrounds.
• Because Australia was undergoing a draught, most of the rain had to be added with computer-generated imagery. Also, the location footage – shot on clear days – needed to be enhanced; the bright blue sky ended up acting as a “blue screen” for the insertion of storm clouds.
• In total, there were 800 computer-enhanced shots in the low-budget film.
• Blanks actually had someone else shot the porno film briefly glimpsed on the television set in the farmhouse; Blanks himself supplied the music, calling it the “worst” cue he has ever written.

Although entertaining, the audio commentary is also quite frustrating. Several times, Blanks refers to deleted footage or other items that he hopes will be on the DVD as bonus features – yet none of them are available on this disc. Perhaps a “Special Edition” disc is in the works, but DVD distributors should be more careful about delivering the goods instead of frustrating their customers.

One small consolation should be derived from the fact that Blanks himself changed his mind about one missing bonus feature: While recording the audio commentary, he expressed hope that a deleted scene showing Fares as a metal sculptor (setting up her later ability to fashion available metal into weapons) would appear on the DVD. During a later question-and-answer session after a festival screening of the film, he said:

There’s a whole sequence that I shot – and I threw away, because I hated the scene – with her in her workshop, building this stuff, to establish how handy she was. I just thought it was a little bit lame because we were setting it up so much, and it was kind of obvious where we gonna go with it from that point. So I threw it away. I don’t think it’s even going to end up on the DVD. I think I erased those scenes!

More Background on StormWarningMovie.com

Storm Warning: A Deep Dive into the Australian Horror Film and Its Online Presence

"Storm Warning" is a 2007 Australian horror film that blends elements of the thriller and exploitation genres. It presents a disturbing narrative of survival against the backdrop of rural Australia, pitting a vacationing couple against a trio of sadistic, marijuana-farming rednecks. While the film itself garnered attention for its intense violence and subversion of genre tropes, the website StormWarningMovie.com served as a promotional hub and information source for the film. This article will delve into the film's plot, cast, reception, and the role of the website in shaping its online presence and audience engagement.

Plot Summary

The film centers around Rob and Pia, a young couple embarking on a sailing trip along the Australian coastline. A sudden, violent storm forces them to seek refuge on a desolate island. They stumble upon a dilapidated house and barn, discovering a large marijuana crop, hinting at the unwelcome nature of the property owners. Their fears are realized when the family returns: Poppy, the terrifying patriarch, and his sons, Brett and Jimmy.

The family, resentful of the couple's affluent status and intrusion, imprisons Rob and Pia. The couple is subjected to physical and psychological torture, leading them to fear for their lives. As they realize the family intends to kill them, Rob and Pia decide to fight back, pushing themselves to extremes they never imagined to survive. The film culminates in a violent confrontation where the couple must kill their captors to escape.

Cast and Characters

• Nadia Farès as Pia: Pia undergoes a significant transformation throughout the film. Initially presented as a somewhat squeamish wife, she evolves into a resourceful and determined survivor, displaying unexpected strength and brutality.

• Robert Taylor as Rob: Rob is portrayed as the physically stronger of the two, but he is ultimately incapacitated, leaving Pia to take the lead in their fight for survival. His character highlights the subversion of typical gender roles in horror films.

• John Brumpton as Poppy: Poppy is the menacing and depraved head of the family. Brumpton's portrayal is particularly chilling, embodying the film's themes of brutality and moral decay.

• David Lyons as Jimmy: Jimmy is the more intelligent and cunning of the two brothers, displaying hints of wit and a sense of class resentment.

• Mathew Wilkinson as Brett: Brett is depicted as a more straightforward and brutish character, though Wilkinson's performance adds shades of gray, suggesting the potential for a different path.

Reception and Reviews

"Storm Warning" received mixed to positive reviews from critics and audiences, with praise directed toward its intense violence, performances, and subversion of genre conventions. However, some critics found the plot predictable and derivative of other films in the "killer redneck family" subgenre, such as "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and "Wolf Creek."

Positive aspects highlighted in reviews include:

• Gore and violence: Many reviewers praised the film's graphic and inventive violence, particularly in the final act. Some found the gore to be excessive, while others appreciated its cathartic effect and the way it served the story.

• Performances: The cast's performances were generally well-received, with Nadia Farès and David Lyons singled out for their portrayals of Pia and Jimmy, respectively.

• Tension and pacing: Some reviewers noted the film's ability to build tension and maintain a furious pace, keeping viewers on the edge of their seats.

• Subversion of genre tropes: The film's willingness to challenge genre expectations, such as the reversal of gender roles and the focus on the villains' comeuppance, was also praised.

Criticisms included:

• Predictable plot: Some critics found the film's plot to be derivative of other horror films, particularly those featuring "killer redneck families."

• Slow start: Several reviewers noted that the film takes a while to get going, with a slow first half that may bore some viewers.

• Lack of originality: While some praised the film's subversion of genre tropes, others felt that it did not offer enough new or original ideas.

Accolades

• Justin Dix won the Screamfest Festival Trophy for Best Special Effects.

Audience Reception

The provided Rotten Tomatoes audience reviews indicate a mixed reception. While some viewers appreciated the film's gore, tension, and performances, others found it predictable, slow-moving, and ultimately unsatisfying. Some viewers compared it favorably to films like "Wolf Creek" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre," while others felt it fell short of those standards.

StormWarningMovie.com: A Promotional Tool

The website StormWarningMovie.com served as a central online resource for the film. While the specific content and features of the website at its peak are not fully detailed in the provided text, it likely included:

• Synopsis and plot details: Providing an overview of the film's story to entice potential viewers.

• Cast and crew information: Showcasing the actors and filmmakers involved in the project.

• Trailers and clips: Offering visual previews of the film's intense and violent content.

• Images and behind-the-scenes material: Providing a glimpse into the making of the film.

• News and updates: Sharing information about the film's release, reviews, and festival screenings.

• Links to purchase or rent the film: Guiding viewers to platforms where they could watch the movie.

• Fan forums or comment sections: Allowing viewers to discuss and share their thoughts on the film.

The website played a crucial role in shaping the film's online presence and engaging with its target audience. It served as a hub for information, promotion, and community building.

Cultural and Social Significance

"Storm Warning" contributes to the "outback horror" subgenre of Australian cinema, which explores themes of isolation, violence, and the clash between urban and rural cultures. The film's portrayal of rural Australians as sadistic and depraved reflects a recurring trope in this genre, often sparking controversy and debate about its representation of Australian identity.

The film's intense violence and exploitation elements also raise questions about its moral and ethical implications. While some viewers may find the violence cathartic and entertaining, others may find it gratuitous and exploitative. The film's depiction of sexual violence, in particular, is a subject of debate and scrutiny.

Analysis and Insights

"Storm Warning" can be analyzed through several lenses:

• Genre subversion: The film challenges traditional horror tropes by reversing gender roles and focusing on the villains' comeuppance.

• Social commentary: The film touches on themes of class conflict, cultural misunderstanding, and the dark side of human nature.

• Exploitation cinema: The film embraces elements of exploitation cinema, such as graphic violence and sexual content, to shock and titillate viewers.

• Australian identity: The film contributes to the ongoing debate about the representation of Australian identity in cinema, particularly in the horror genre.

"Storm Warning" is a controversial and divisive film that continues to generate discussion and debate. Its intense violence, subversion of genre tropes, and exploration of challenging themes have earned it both praise and criticism. The website StormWarningMovie.com played a vital role in promoting the film and engaging with its audience, contributing to its online presence and legacy. While the film may not be for everyone, it remains a significant example of Australian horror cinema, pushing boundaries and challenging viewers' expectations.